Papers with text rewriting
DP-GTR: Differentially Private Prompt Protection via Group Text Rewriting (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for prompt privacy focus on document-level rewriting, neglecting rich, multi-granular representations of text. |
| Approach: | a framework that leverages local differential privacy and composition theorem via group text rewriting is proposed . the framework is compatible with existing rewrite techniques and is publicly available at anonymous.4open.science for reproducibility. |
| Outcome: | DP-GTR is the first framework to integrate document-level and word-level information while exploiting in-context learning to improve privacy and utility. |
When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detail (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Differential privacy provides a formal approach to privacy of individuals. |
| Approach: | They propose to use ADePT to provide differentially private auto-encoders for text rewriting to provide tight privacy guarantees for users' original utterances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm is not differentially private, thus rendering the experimental results unsubstantiated. |
Towards an On-device Agent for Text Rewriting (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Yun Zhu, Yinxiao Liu, Felix Stahlberg, Shankar Kumar, Yu-Hui Chen, Liangchen Luo, Lei Shu, Renjie Liu, Jindong Chen, Lei Meng
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities for text rewriting, however creating a smaller yet potent language model presents two formidable challenges: costly data collection and absence of emergent capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a new instruction tuning method to develop a mo-bile text rewriting model that leverages LLM-generated data and heuristic reinforcement learning, eliminating the need for human data collection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model surpasses the current state-of-the-art LLMs in text rewriting while maintaining a significantly reduced model size using public benchmark EditEval and our new benchmark. |
Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Anjana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Lai, Ishan Purohit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Patel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Keyur Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit, Xudong Shen
| Challenge: | a benchmark of 1,616 diverse NLP tasks and their expert-written instructions is used to test generalization of models to unseen tasks . a recent study shows that instruction-following models outperform instruction-based models by over 9% . |
| Approach: | They build a benchmark of 1,616 diverse NLP tasks and their expert-written instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing instruction-following models by over 9% on the benchmark despite being smaller. |
NAP2: A Benchmark for Naturalness and Privacy-Preserving Text Rewriting by Learning from Human (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Shuo Huang, William Maclean, Xiaoxi Kang, Qiongkai Xu, Zhuang Li, Xingliang Yuan, Gholamreza Haffari, Lizhen Qu
| Challenge: | a large number of large language models are being used to protect user privacy . sanitizing sensitive text using two common strategies is the answer . |
| Approach: | They propose sanitizing sensitive text using deleting expressions and abstracting them . they propose a tool for text rewriting that uses crowdsourcing and large language models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach protects privacy before sending sensitive data to large language models . it combines crowdsourcing and large language modeling to create a text rewrite tool . |
A-TIP: Attribute-aware Text Infilling via Pre-trained Language Model (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text infilling focus on the infill length of blanks and attribute relevance, but attribute-aware content can be more useful. |
| Approach: | They propose an attribute-aware text infilling method via a Pre-trained language model which contains a text in filling component and a plug-and-play discriminator. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves attribute relevance without decreasing text fluency on three open-source datasets. |
DP-MLM: Differentially Private Text Rewriting Using Masked Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text privatization using Differential Privacy rely on autoregressive models which lack a mechanism to contextualize the private rewriting process. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for differentially private text rewriting using masked language models to rewrite a text one token at a time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method preserves utility at lower levels, compared to previous methods relying on autoregressive models with a decoder. |
Compression, Transduction, and Creation: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Natural Language Generation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural language generation (NLG) tasks have complex nature and require manual evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a unifying perspective based on the nature of information change in NLG tasks . they propose 'information alignment' metrics that can be used to evaluate different aspects of NLG . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics achieve stronger or comparable correlations with human judgement compared to state-of-the-art metrics in diverse tasks. |
CLEAR: A Comprehensive Linguistic Evaluation of Argument Rewriting by Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Improvement (ArgImp) is a text rewriting task that requires LLMs to shorten texts while increasing word length and merging sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a pipeline to evaluate LLMs' behavior in a text rewriting setting . they use four linguistic levels to examine the qualities of argumentative texts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation pipeline compares LLMs on argumentative texts and their improvement on a broad set of argumentation corpora. |